<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CES Day One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40</link>
	<description>Radar - laser detectors and jammers blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-17505</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-17505</guid>
		<description>So what ever happened to the "database" for the 9500i model?
"Escort says that they also plan on offering “marked locations” to users so they can download a larger database."

I see now they have come out with a 9500iX model with those features.
Have we early adopters been left behind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what ever happened to the &#8220;database&#8221; for the 9500i model?<br />
&#8220;Escort says that they also plan on offering “marked locations” to users so they can download a larger database.&#8221;</p>
<p>I see now they have come out with a 9500iX model with those features.<br />
Have we early adopters been left behind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orlin</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-9536</link>
		<dc:creator>orlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-9536</guid>
		<description>is the speed measurement based on the GPS on the 9500i accurate?  there is about a 4-5 mi difference with respect with my spedometer at speeds above 60mph.  i would assume that the 9500i speed is more accurate, however, every ticket for speeding i have received has been more or accurate to the best of my judgement.  Anyone have similar discrepancies?  is it possible for the GPS based calculation to be "off?"  thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the speed measurement based on the GPS on the 9500i accurate?  there is about a 4-5 mi difference with respect with my spedometer at speeds above 60mph.  i would assume that the 9500i speed is more accurate, however, every ticket for speeding i have received has been more or accurate to the best of my judgement.  Anyone have similar discrepancies?  is it possible for the GPS based calculation to be &#8220;off?&#8221;  thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-8687</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-8687</guid>
		<description>I guess I take it back. I did some research. Just from my experience (Wisconsin) we dont have those devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I take it back. I did some research. Just from my experience (Wisconsin) we dont have those devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-8685</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-8685</guid>
		<description>I work in Law Enforcement. And there is no way for us to detect that you have a radar detector unless we see it on your windshield. This STEALTH mode seems like a sales ploy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in Law Enforcement. And there is no way for us to detect that you have a radar detector unless we see it on your windshield. This STEALTH mode seems like a sales ploy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natty</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-4653</link>
		<dc:creator>Natty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 09:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-4653</guid>
		<description>Question does it pic photo radars or not am in an area where there is loads of them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question does it pic photo radars or not am in an area where there is loads of them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teemer</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-4040</link>
		<dc:creator>Teemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 13:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-4040</guid>
		<description>How does the escort 9500i perform in the detection of side/rear photo radar?

Thanks

Teemer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the escort 9500i perform in the detection of side/rear photo radar?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Teemer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mini Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-4017</link>
		<dc:creator>Mini Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 00:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-4017</guid>
		<description>I just upgraded from a X50 to the 9500i. For me the feature I was looking for was the speed measurement. Was impresed that all the hard were worked from the 50 so no changing the car from there just plug, program and play. I read that the when TrueLock is used that it only ignors that frq. Or am I reading this wrong? Other than that Wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just upgraded from a X50 to the 9500i. For me the feature I was looking for was the speed measurement. Was impresed that all the hard were worked from the 50 so no changing the car from there just plug, program and play. I read that the when TrueLock is used that it only ignors that frq. Or am I reading this wrong? Other than that Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-3862</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 19:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-3862</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note about Escort's great customer service: I own an Escort Passport 8500, which I love, but on a recent trip I lost one of the suction cups that holds the detector to the windshield.  I called Escort to obtain a replacement suction cup, expecting to pay at least a shipping fee.  Nope!  They just took my address and send they'd send a replacement cup out immediately, free of charge.  I'll also say that I've dropped the Passport 8550 at least three times and left it in a closed car in 100 F degree heat (so it was probably 120+ in the car), and it still works perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note about Escort&#8217;s great customer service: I own an Escort Passport 8500, which I love, but on a recent trip I lost one of the suction cups that holds the detector to the windshield.  I called Escort to obtain a replacement suction cup, expecting to pay at least a shipping fee.  Nope!  They just took my address and send they&#8217;d send a replacement cup out immediately, free of charge.  I&#8217;ll also say that I&#8217;ve dropped the Passport 8550 at least three times and left it in a closed car in 100 F degree heat (so it was probably 120+ in the car), and it still works perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>When I purchased my first Escort 8500, it was boasted to be upgradable.  I inquired, $50 credit and buy a new one.   Escort has won me over with thier words of service/upgradability.   But now I live in Virginia, I spent the money on the BEL STi.   I don't think it is as good as my previous Escort, seems to be a little slower in response, but I have that "STEALTH" feature to keep the detector from being detected.   Wish Escort would add that in a detector like BEL did, I would then come back to Escort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I purchased my first Escort 8500, it was boasted to be upgradable.  I inquired, $50 credit and buy a new one.   Escort has won me over with thier words of service/upgradability.   But now I live in Virginia, I spent the money on the BEL STi.   I don&#8217;t think it is as good as my previous Escort, seems to be a little slower in response, but I have that &#8220;STEALTH&#8221; feature to keep the detector from being detected.   Wish Escort would add that in a detector like BEL did, I would then come back to Escort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carry Grain</title>
		<link>http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>Carry Grain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radarroy.com/archives/40#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>Dear Roy,

I am from Europe. Which RD you suggest me to buy - STI or 9500i?  When will you test 9500i Stealth Capabilities against VG-4 and Spectre II/III?  Why STI doesn't have Ku-band? I don't know what type RDD our traffic police is using but they anounce that can detect all radar detectors etc.

Best regards,

Carry Grain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Roy,</p>
<p>I am from Europe. Which RD you suggest me to buy - STI or 9500i?  When will you test 9500i Stealth Capabilities against VG-4 and Spectre II/III?  Why STI doesn&#8217;t have Ku-band? I don&#8217;t know what type RDD our traffic police is using but they anounce that can detect all radar detectors etc.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Carry Grain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
