8 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif
sv650k4 said in November 5th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

i so envy people with planes have you found anything to jam aircraft radar yet?

mygif
Radar Roy said in November 6th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

Personally, I want to know where other planes are, so I wouldn’t want to jam aircraft radar

mygif
FERNANDO CABALLERO said in November 19th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

ROY,I LIVE IN CORPUS CHRISTS TX AND BEEN SEENING ALOT OF POLICE OFFICER WITH RADAR OR LASER BINOCULARS.MY RX65 BEL.DETECTOR DOSE NOT PICK THEM UP.BUT WORKS FINE WITH EVER THING ON POLICE CARS.IS THERE A NEW RADAR BAN IN TX.

mygif
Radar Roy said in November 19th, 2009 at 10:39 pm

Sounds like a kustom pro lite laser gun. Radar detectors all suck at detecting laser. You’ll need a Blinder laser jammer: http://www.radarroysbuyersguide.com/BlinderM27

Use that link for a 10% discount;
Use promo code FB8259 at checkout

mygif
flmuniz said in December 27th, 2009 at 9:58 am

Roy,

I live in one of the two places where detectors are ilegal. I however, do a lot of road traveling and the cops are everywhere. I was thinking of a custom installed product. I have used escort radars before and have found their quality and performance superb. Would you recomend the QI45 or is there another product out there better for my needs?

BTW I once owned a radar from RMR and it was the biggest peace of junk that I have ever owned. They should be banned, no one should buy them. I cant tell they where cheap from the moment I opened the box. Please keep making people aware of the horrible quality.

Thanks
Francisco

mygif
Radar Roy said in December 28th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

The problem with the QI45 is that the detector can be detected with the Spectre RDD, a device that is used to detect radar detectors. You would want a detector that would be stealth to these devices such as the 9500ci

mygif
j.soker said in December 30th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

roy,
THANKS FOR THE UPDATES, IN A ROAD-TEST THAT MY BROTHER AND I HELD TOGETHER, WE PITTED HIS TOP-OF-LINE COBRA AGAINST MY NEW 85OO X50, WE USED COMMON WALKIE-TALKIES WITH 1/2 MI RANGE TO KEEP IN TOUCH.

IN THE CITY, THE ESCORT 8500 CAME IN TIED WITH THE COBRA, AT DETECTING THE SPEED TRAPS THAT OUR LOCAL AND, STATE AUTHORITIES ARE USING, HOWEVER THE ESCORT WAS GIVING LESS FALSE TONES THAN THE COBRA GAVE. MAKING THE X50 A DETECTOR THAT “LEARNS”…

ON THE HIGHWAY TEST WE DID THE SAME THING WE TOOK NOTE OF TONES AND PAYED ATTENTION TO ALL ALERTS GIVEN REGARDLESS OF THE DETECTOR, WE PULLED OVER AT A TRUCK STOP AND COMPARED NOTES, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT WE BOTH ARMED OUR DETECTORS TO ALERT AS AUTOMATICALLY AS POSSIBLE, OUT OF A LIST OF 50 ALERTS, BOTH IN CITY AND OUT, THE X50, GAVE 42% LESS FALSE ALERTS THAN THE COBRA, RANGE CAME IN AT ALMOST A TIE DUE TO HILLS, BUT THAT IS WHERE THE X50 SHINED, IT WAS ABLE TO SNIFF OUT SIGNAL FROM THE OTHER SIDE GIVING US TIME TO RE-ACT.

HIGHWAY RESULTS WERE A LITTLE DIFFERENT, HIS COBRA WAS ABLE TO PICK UP FIXED RADAR AND LASER POSITIONS WHERE MY X50 WASNT ABLE TO TELL ME, IT DID HOWEVER ALERT ME TO THE SITUATION.

SO THE TEST CONCLUSION, THE TOP-OF-THE-LINE COBRA, PITTED AGAINST THE X50 ESCORT, RESULTS ESCORT LESS FALSE ALERTS, BETTER SENSITIVITY AND RANGE, THE COBRA ACURATE AT FIXED RADAR/LASER SITES.

BOTH WILL ALERT UPON SIGNAL DETECTION.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR REVIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PRIOR TO MY PURCHASING A DETECTOR, AND FOR YOUR LIST OF FACTORY AUTHORIZED SERVICE CENTERS.

BECAUSE OF THIS BOTH THE COBRA AND MY X50, HAVE KEPT THE POLICE AT BAY, AND PAID FOR THEMSELVES, RELIABLY MANY, MANY TIMES OVER. OUR FAMILIES, THANK YOU.

=]

mygif
Peter said in January 6th, 2010 at 8:50 pm

Thats what I’m talking about lol :)

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)

Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments